What’s the best way to raise a baby? Do you put the baby on a strict feeding regime from day one, making sure to tell it who is boss? Or do you sleep with the baby and always carry him around in a sling, letting him suckle your breast as he wishes?
My husband and I watched, rather wide-eyed at times, ‘Bringing Up Baby’ on Channel 4 last night. The show features six British families raising their babies according to three dramatically methods, each coached by an expert.
Claire Verity advocates the strict 1950s view that children should me made a part of your life, and if the little creatures doesn’t agree with that, too bad. Let it cry. Feeding (by bottle preferably) is every four hours, no matter if the baby is hungry or not. No cuddling while feeding. Instead you should hold the baby away from your body ’so it doesn’t doze off’. In between feedings the child should be put outside to sleep in their pushchair. You should not tend to him if he cries. Then at night, the baby is put in his cot ( in a separate room from the parents) at exactly 7pm. You do not enter the room except for feeding every four hours until 7am. The happy end result, says Claire, is a baby who will sleep and eat textbook-style, and within weeks the baby will sleep through the night.
And on the other end of spectrum we have new-age mummy Claire Scott who promotes the Continuum Concept which blossomed in the 1970s. These babies are raised as those in Amazon jungle tribes. They always sleep with their parents and they are always carried in a sling with unlimited access to the breast. Pushchairs are simply not used. The result is a happy, confident baby who rarely cries, says Scott.
Dreena Hamilton takes the middle road with Dr Spock’s ‘trust yourself’ theory. Being a parent is about loving and bonding with your baby, in a non-routine sort of way. The parents should adjust to having a baby and should not expect to have their old life back in any way. Dr Spock won fame in the 1960s, perhaps as a reaction to the military-style parenting the decade before?
Let’s start with Ms. Verity. Oh where to begin…. First, how can a newborn possibly be expected only to eat four hours? They have very small stomachs. So how can you possibly ignore your crying baby when you know his hungry? But the worst about this method is that it doesn’t allow for any bonding between parent and child. You feed the baby, change the nappy and put it away, that’s it! Nothing in this world will be able to stop me from cuddling with my baby. They are made for loving, so soft and round and wonderful. If you don’t interact with your baby, you don’t bond with him, and it makes it harder to love and really care about him. And the baby thrives on human interaction, in fact it’s vital for their development. I really find it difficult to believe that Verity’s babies can possibly develop very well. They might sleep through the night very soon, but are they happy babies who are confident their needs are met?
But I don’t like the Continuum Concept which falls in line with the annoying ‘back-to-nature’ theme of today’s trendy mummies. This method might work well in jungle tribes, but we don’t live there now, do we? Woman in tribal societies carry their babies for practical reasons; in order to get their work done they carry their babies with them. A bit hard to fetch water from the well with the baby in a pushchair, isn’t it? Our Western lifestyle is so different to theirs that we possibly couldn’t just apply their parenting style to ours. And if you are constantly carrying your baby around, be prepared to do that when they are older…and heavier.
Dr Spock’s ideas are the most appealing, but certainly not perfect. I think I prefer more structure.
To quote what my husband said last night: ‘This is scary. What have we gotten ourselves into?’